If the UK leaves the EU without a withdrawal agreement (a no-deal scenario), UK firms doing business in the EEA will need to consider if and on what basis it may be possible to continue after Brexit. Firms should consider the legal position carefully, seeking advice where appropriate. As firms prepare for Brexit, it is important that senior managers ensure execution is managed appropriately. Firms should discuss their future plans, including contingency plans and underlying assumptions, with us.
Outward passporting and the treatment of clients
When the UK leaves the EU, passporting rights will fall away. Therefore, if you do business in the EEA based on a passport then you will need to consider if and on what basis it may be possible to continue after Brexit. For example, UK MiFID investment firms will no longer be able to use a passport to provide cross-border services.
There are other ways firms can access the EEA which may not be affected by Brexit, although these will depend on the specific firm, type of activity and the exemption or local permission in question. These include permission under local law or based on rules of a local financial market infrastructure, and local exemptions in an individual EU country.
Firms should speak to regulators in EEA jurisdictions where their clients are based, and have regard to the relevant national law in those jurisdictions. For example, if you intend to rely on reverse solicitation to service existing EEA-based customers without local authorisation, we strongly encourage you to seek legal advice on your plans and understand the national law in each Member State in which you conduct business, to ensure this is permitted in the relevant country and how this impacts your no-deal planning. You should also bear in mind that national regimes may change over time and this could affect your business model in the future.
Firms should also be aware that in the event of a Brexit with no implementation period agreed, some EEA regulators have put forward proposals to temporarily allow the continuation of some investment activities for UK firms that are currently passporting in to those jurisdictions.
In all cases, firms should consider the legal position carefully, seeking advice where appropriate.
You will need to decide on your approach to servicing clients under existing contracts, taking the steps available to you to continue to service customers following local law and local regulators’ expectations. We expect fair treatment of customers, irrespective of where they are based. In many cases, it would be a poor outcome for the client for you simply to stop servicing them.
Access to financial market infrastructure
We are strongly supportive of open financial markets, cross border trade, high regulatory standards and mutual recognition of cross border regimes based on equivalent outcomes. We will continue to assess firms’ plans for the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and consider the impact these plans may have on clients and the markets. As firms prepare for EU withdrawal, it is important that senior managers ensure execution is managed appropriately. Firms should discuss their future plans, including contingency plans and underlying assumptions, with us, including in respect of market access models, operational models and execution arrangements. We also expect firms to discuss how they will communicate with their clients about these changes and their impacts.
Access to clearing
The UK government has legislated to ensure that UK businesses can continue to use clearing services provided by EU-based clearing houses. The Bank of England has published an interim list of third-country CCPs that, in a no-deal scenario, will offer clearing services and activities in the UK under the temporary recognition regime (TRR).
On 19 December 2018, the European Commission confirmed that in a no-deal scenario, UK central counterparties (CCPs) would be deemed equivalent for 12 months after exit day, and central securities depositories (CSDs) for 24 months after exit day. This will allow EU counterparties to clear new trades with UK CCPs.
Ability of firms to trade on UK and EU trading venues
Broadly speaking, the EU’s Trading Obligation under MiFIR requires EU investment firms to trade EU-listed or traded shares on EU trading venues (or venues in jurisdictions deemed equivalent by the EU). The same obligation of trading on EU venues applies to EU financial and non-financial counterparties in relation to some classes of over the counter (OTC) derivatives. The UK will also have a reciprocal trading obligation when it leaves the EU.
The determination of equivalence for trading venues outside the EU is a decision for the European Commission, and for the Treasury under the onshored UK MiFID regime in relation to venues outside the UK.
Relevant firms should consider how they will continue to trade securities and meet their obligations in both the EU and UK, as well as other equivalent jurisdictions, under a range of scenarios, consider implications for their clients, and discuss their plans and assumptions with us.
Applications by EEA market operators for ROIE status
EEA market operators can apply to become a recognised overseas investment exchange (ROIE) to continue to provide their UK members with access to their market once the UK leaves the EU. Several market operators have applied or expressed a formal intention to apply to become ROIEs. To help UK users of EEA market operators plan, we have published a list of EEA market operators applying to become a ROIE. The market operators’ details that have already been recognised by the FCA as a ROIE are available on the Financial Services Register.
Continuing to meet threshold conditions
If you are expanding your presence elsewhere in Europe, the structures you put in place must enable us to supervise the conduct of your UK business effectively and ensure that you continue to meet our threshold conditions. Our starting point is not to restrict business models but to understand the principles and practice involved and how the conduct risks that arise from them are managed. We set out some key principles in a letter on Cross-Border Booking Arrangements.
In Primary Market Bulletin 21 we advise market makers and issuers of new regulatory obligations that they will need to implement for the Short Selling Regulation (SSR) and Market Abuse Regulation (MAR).
We have agreed MoUs with ESMA and EU regulators to allow cooperation and exchange of information. These MoUs should should minimise the potential for disruption, which we know is particularly important for the investment management sector, Credit Rating Agencies and Trade Repositories.
If the UK leaves the EU without an implementation period, we expect firms, trading venues and Approved Reporting Mechanisms (ARMs) to make reasonable steps to comply with their requirements under the Transaction Reporting Regime by exit day and any requirements they have to submit instrument reference data.
Explanatory information from the Treasury on how MiFID, UCITS and AIFMD will be onshored into UK domestic law:
- Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018: explanatory information
- The Alternative Investment Fund Managers (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018: explanatory information
- The Collective Investment Schemes (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018: explanatory information
Further information on the National Private Placement Regime.