This consultation paper outlines our proposed changes to the Appointed Representatives (AR) regime. The proposed changes aim to reduce potential harm arising across the sectors where they operate.
Addendum – 13 January 2022
On 13 January 2022, we made a small change to fix an error in paragraph 2.2 on page 54 of the CP. This was to remove the reference to ‘overseas firms’ and mirror the text used to describe scope of application in paragraph 1.15 on page 5.
Why we are consulting
The AR regime was created to allow self-employed representatives to engage in regulated activities without having to be authorised. Over time, it has evolved to include a wider range of business models across sectors and markets.
Our proposed changes to the AR regime aim to reduce potential harm and ensure that the regime delivers good outcomes for consumers and markets.
We are seeing a wide range of harm across all the sectors where firms have ARs. This harm often occurs because principals don’t perform enough due diligence before appointing an AR, or from inadequate oversight and control after an AR has been appointed.
Evidence shows that, on average, principals cause 50 to 400% more supervisory cases than non-principals. It also shows that cases are higher than for non-principals across every sector.
- require principals to provide additional and more timely information on their ARs and how these are overseen, and
- clarify and strengthen the responsibilities and expectations of principals
Additionally, we are seeking views, through a discussion chapter, on other potential areas of policy change. We have also collaborated with the Treasury on its Call for Evidence.
Who should read this
- firms who currently have, or intend to have ARs in future, and by the ARs themselves, and
- consumers and consumer bodies with an interest in the AR regime
This consultation has now closed. We will publish feedback on responses and issue a Policy Statement once we have reviewed your comments.