The temporary permissions regime for inbound passporting EEA firms and funds

The temporary permissions regime will enable relevant firms and funds which passport into the UK to continue operating in the UK if the passporting regime falls away abruptly when the UK leaves the EU.

UPDATE 30 OCTOBER 2019

The UK and the EU have agreed to extend the date for the UK’s departure from the EU. 

Firms

In light of this extension, the notification window for firms that will be solo-regulated by us (and whose passports do not include PRA regulated activities) will now close at the end of 30 January 2020.

PRA-regulated firms should note that it is no longer possible to submit a notification to enter the regime and should refer to the PRA's website for further information

Firms that have already submitted a notification need take no further action.

Funds

The notification window for fund managers to notify us of which of their stock of passported funds they wish to continue to market in the UK temporarily will now also close at the end of 30 January 2020.

Fund managers that have already submitted a notification need take no further action unless, as a result of this extension, they wish to update their notification before the notification window closes on 30 January 2020. If this is the case, they should email [email protected] by the end of 15 January 2020 at the very latest confirming this and including their FRN.

We intend to publish further details of the process by which new EEA sub-funds which are authorised after exit, but form part of an umbrella scheme that notified for TPR prior to exit, may be added into the regime. This will enable these new sub-funds to market to UK investors. We expect this process to be broadly similar to the current route by which new sub-funds can be notified for marketing in the UK.

We have made the Temporary Permission Instrument FCA 2019/36 setting out the rules that firms and operators, depositories and trustees of EEA-domiciled funds in the temporary permissions regime will need to comply with. There is more information about these rules in our Policy Statement PS19/5.

EEA passporting firms should also review the information below regarding the Financial Services Contracts Regime which will automatically apply to them if they do not notify us that they wish to enter the temporary permissions regime, but have pre-existing contracts in the UK which would need a permission to service.

Summary

In December 2017, the Government announced that, if necessary, it would introduce a temporary permissions regime for inbound passporting EEA firms and investment funds.

If there is not an implementation period and the passporting regime falls away when the UK leaves the EU, the temporary permissions regime will provide a backstop to ensure firms and investment funds can continue their business with minimal disruption.

It will allow inbound firms to continue operating in the UK within the scope of their current permissions for a limited period after exit day, while seeking full UK authorisation. It will also allow investment funds with a passport to continue temporarily marketing in the UK.

This page explains more about how the regime will operate including an explanation of which firms and funds can use the temporary permissions regime and the process by which firms and funds will need to notify us that they want to enter the regime and obtain a temporary permission.


On this page      
The current situation What will change after Brexit Inbound firms and investment funds who can use the regime The notification process for firms
Considerations for firms leaving the regime The notification process for funds Temporary permissions regime funding The financial services contracts regime
The transitional power and application of legislative requirements to firms and investment funds Prepare for the regime Next steps  

The current situation

Financial services firms in any European Economic Area (EEA) member state can use the passporting regime to establish a presence or carry out permitted activities in any other member state. Investment funds can be marketed across the EEA under similar passporting provisions.

In March 2018, the UK and the EU reached an agreement on the terms of an implementation (or transitional) period following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU.

The implementation period is intended to operate from exit day, as amended, until the end of December 2020. During this time, EU law would remain applicable in the United Kingdom, in accordance with the overall withdrawal agreement. Firms and funds would continue to benefit from passporting between the UK and the EEA as they do today. Obligations derived from EU law would continue to apply and firms must continue with implementation plans for EU legislation that is still to come into effect before the end of December 2020.

However, we are continuing to prepare for a range of scenarios, including a scenario where the UK leaves the EU without a deal and without entering an implementation period.

In December 2017, the Government said it would bring forward legislation to establish a temporary permissions regime for inbound passported firms and investment funds, to enable them to continue their activities in the UK for a limited period after withdrawal. If there is not an implementation period and the passporting regime falls away when the UK leaves the EU, the temporary permissions regime will provide a backstop. It will allow inbound firms to continue operating in the UK within the scope of their current permissions for a limited period after exit day, while seeking full UK authorisation. It will also allow investment funds with a passport to continue marketing in the UK while seeking UK recognition.

The Treasury has put the legislative framework that will establish the temporary permissions regime in place. All four Statutory Instruments (SI) have now passed into law. These relate to:

What will change after Brexit

If the UK leaves the EU with no deal, it will become a ‘third country’ in relation to the EU and EEA firms will no longer be able to passport into the UK. As such, EEA firms may need to seek authorisation in the UK to continue to access the UK market. Similarly, EEA investment funds will also need to seek UK recognition to continue to market in the UK.

Under the temporary permissions regime, EEA firms currently passporting into the UK which notify us will be deemed to have permission under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) on a temporary basis. The scope of the permission will reflect the scope of a firm’s passporting permission pre-Brexit.

As above, separate legislation will enable EEA investment funds to continue to be marketed in the UK during the regime.

If required the temporary permissions regime will come into force when the UK leaves the EU. We expect the regime will be in place for a maximum of three years within which time firms and investment funds will be required to obtain authorisation or recognition in the UK, if required.

Inbound firms and investment funds which can use the regime

Firms which can use the regime

  • Firms which have passports under Schedule 3 to FSMA in place before exit day, including firms with top-up permission.
  • Treaty firms under Schedule 4 to FSMA which qualify for authorisation before exit day, including firms with top-up permission.
  • Electronic money, payment institutions and registered account information service providers who are exercising their passporting rights under the Electronic Money Directive (EMD) or the Payment Services Directive (PSD2) before exit day.

These rights could be on a freedom of establishment basis, a freedom to provide services basis or both. But the scope of a particular firm’s temporary permission is determined by the type of passport it had and what was in its passport prior to exit day.

Investment funds which can use the regime

The following EEA-domiciled investment funds will be able to use the regime, if we have received notification of their intention to market in the UK under the relevant passport prior to exit day.

  • UCITS schemes
  • Alternative Investment Funds (including EuVECAs, EuSEFs, ELTIFs and AIFs authorised as MMFs) managed by EEA domiciled firms

The operator of an EEA UCITS which on exit from the EU benefits from the temporary extension to the marketing regime will also be able to market ‘new sub-funds’ (ie those authorised by the relevant home state regulator after exit day) in the United Kingdom, subject to certain conditions.

Firms with MiFID tied agents

Firms which enter the temporary permissions regime will have Part 4A permission. Therefore, those firms whose MiFID tied agents are on (or are added to) the FS Register on exit day will continue to be able to act for the firm during its time in the regime. Tied agents which are not shown on the FS Register are not able to carry on regulated activities from exit day.

Firms considering using the financial service contracts regime to run off their UK regulated business should note that the regime for cross-border services firms (contractual run-off) does not support the use of tied agents in the United Kingdom.

Credit institutions and insurers

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA at the Bank of England is the lead authority for authorising incoming EEA credit institutions and insurers. 

The period for a PRA-regulated firm to notify the PRA that it wishes to enter the TPR set out in the PRA’s Direction (PRA Direction: ‘Temporary permission and variation: notification before exit day’ 7 November 2018) as amended by the PRA Direction – ‘Temporary permission and variation: notification before exit day (amendment) 28 March 2019) ended on 11 April 2019.

It is no longer possible to submit a notification in accordance with the PRA’s Direction. It remains possible for a PRA-regulated firm to enter the TPR by making an application for a Part 4A permission or an application to vary a Part 4A permission, before exit day, in accordance with regulation 14(1)(a) of the TPR Regulations.

However, the information we provide here is still relevant to these firms, specifically the section on how we will be applying our Handbook to firms in the temporary permissions regime.

Gibraltar-based firms

Gibraltar-based firms that passport into the UK will not need to use the temporary permissions regime and will generally be able to continue to operate as they do now post-Brexit until 2020. The UK government will work closely with the Government of Gibraltar to design a replacement framework for after 2020.

We will be consulting on the basis for calculating 2019/20 fees and levies for Gibraltar-based firms in our June 2019 quarterly consultation paper.

The notification process for firms

Firms will need to notify us that they wish to use the regime using our Connect system. Notifications will need to be submitted by the end of 30 January 2020. Firms should also have regard to the following directions which amend our earlier directions regarding submission of notifications.

Firms that have already submitted a notification need take no further action.

We have also published a guide to Connect for firms (PDF) covering the notification process.

There will be no fee for firms notifying us that they wish to use the regime and firms should not wait for confirmation of whether there will be an implementation period before they submit their notification.

Firms that have not submitted a notification will not be able to use the temporary permissions regime.

Withdrawing a notification

If a firm withdraws its notification in writing before exit day it will not enter the temporary permissions regime.

To withdraw its notification, a firm must do so in writing to us at: [email protected] before exit day.

For more information, read the supplementary directions for:

Details of firms with temporary permission will be shown on the FS Register.

Rules which will apply to firms in the temporary permissions regime

As firms in the regime will have Part 4A permission, the home-host state restrictions on regulatory action will no longer apply and they will come within the full scope of our supervision and rule-making powers. In implementing the regime, we are seeking to take a proportionate approach that will enable firms to comply with our requirements from Day 1 while maintaining an adequate level of consumer protection.

We have made the temporary permission rules instrument FCA 2019/36 setting out the rules which will apply to firms and investment funds in the regime (firms may also be interested in Policy Statement PS19/5 which provides more background). In summary, these rules are:

  • General provision – We will apply most of the Handbook via new provisions in GEN 2.2.26R onwards which apply rules that currently apply to passporting firms to temporary permission firms, plus UK home state rules which implement directives (subject to substituted compliance) plus certain other UK rules were protections would otherwise fall away.
  • Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) – The FCA and the PRA each make rules which set out how FSCS cover works and is funded, covering different areas of the financial services industry. The temporary permissions regime legislation provides that the FSCS is only to cover UK branches (with limited cover for cross-border services) during the temporary permission regime in relation to the FCA’s areas of responsibility. Accordingly, our approach is to provide customers of firms with UK branches in the regime with FSCS protection, equivalent to the cover provided to customers of UK firms. This will address the possibility that the UK’s withdrawal from the EU could result in customers of these firms losing compensation scheme protection offered by home states. Firms in the temporary permissions regime will be required to contribute to the cost of the FSCS.
    As a consequence of the legislation, customers of firms in the regime without a UK branch will not have access to the FSCS, other than where there is existing FSCS cover in respect of the activities of certain incoming fund managers.
    The PRA has set out proposals for its areas of responsibility in relation to the FSCS separately (ie for deposit-taking and insurance).
  • Financial Ombudsman Service – Firms in the regime without a UK branch will be included in the Compulsory Jurisdiction (CJ) of the Financial Ombudsman Service. This will ensure that customers of these firms will not lose rights to refer complaints to an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) scheme on exit. These firms will be required to pay case fees and annual levies. Firms with a UK branch are already included in the CJ and this will continue as part of the regime. For firms that are already members of the Voluntary Jurisdiction (VJ), complaints (including post-exit complaints) about their pre-exit activities will continue to come under the VJ as they do now. These firms will also be allowed to pay a reduced VJ levy to reflect that certain activities which were covered by the VJ will now be covered by the CJ going forward.
  • Senior Managers & Certification Regime – In line with the general approach described above, our approach is that, while in the regime, firms with branches should continue to comply with the requirements in relation to Approved Persons that currently apply to them, and then comply with the requirements of the Senior Manager and Certification Regime which are currently stated to apply to EEA branches when these requirements come into force. We have not proposed any requirements in this area for services firms, in line with the current position and the general approach.
  • Safeguarding client money and custody assets (client assets) – To ensure client assets held by firms conducting investment business or insurance mediation are protected and to enable us to effectively supervise firms in the regime, we will require that:
    • Firms report their client assets arrangements to us by email.
    • Investment firms subject to MiFID II provide an English translation of their client assets audit reports to us upon either our request, or receipt of an ‘adverse’ audit report on the adequacy of the firm’s arrangements under its client assets obligations.
    • Firms disclose certain information to UK clients relating to the treatment of their client assets in the event of the firm’s failure. Firms must make this disclosure at the point of entry into the regime for existing clients and in good time before it safeguards client assets for new clients. Firms must make this disclosure in a durable medium and it should not be obscured or disguised by other information.
    • Tied agents and appointed representatives of firms subject to MiFID II in the temporary permissions regime are prohibited from holding client assets.
  • Our Principles for Businesses – Our Principles for Businesses in our PRIN Sourcebook will generally apply in full to firms in the regime.
  • Status disclosure – Firms in the temporary permissions regime will be required to include specific status disclosure wording in letters (or electronic equivalents) to indicate that they are in the regime.
  • Single Financial Guidance Body (SFGB) – The SFGB levies are raised to fund the SFGB which is now known as the Money and Pensions Service (MAPS). As proposed in our Consultation Paper CP19/16 for 2019/20 there will be no change to current way that EEA firms pay the SFGB levies.
  • Devolved Authorities’ debt advice levy – The debt advice levy is raised to fund debt advice for consumers in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. All EEA firms in the regime will be required to contribute to Devolved Authorities’ debt advice costs from the 2019/20 levy fee year on the same basis as they contribute to the SFGB debt advice levy.
  • Illegal money lending (IML) levy – The IML levy is raised to recover the expenses that the Treasury incurs providing funding for the teams tackling illegal money lending and is recovered from consumer credit firms. The basis for calculating the IML levy mirrors that of FCA fees. As proposed in our Consultation Paper CP19/16 for 2019/20 there will be no change to current way that EEA firms pay the IML levy. 

Further details are included in our Policy Statement.

Firms in the supervised run-off regime of the Financial Services Contracts Regime (described below) are generally subject to the rules above, with certain modifications, for example in relation to status disclosure.

Considerations for firms leaving the regime

Once in the regime, we will allocate firms that will be solo-regulated by us a period (a ‘landing slot’) within which they will need to submit their application for UK authorisation. After exit day, we will confirm firms’ landing slots so they can start to prepare their applications. Firms will need to demonstrate that they meet our threshold conditions both on authorisation and on an ongoing basis. They should also consider how their UK business should be structured, including whether to apply for authorisation through a branch or as a UK-incorporated subsidiary.

Firms with top-up permissions will need to submit a Variation of Permissions (VoP) application rather than an authorisation application.

If firms change their plans they will be able to apply to cancel their temporary permission once they have ceased all UK business.

Our approach to international firms

We are currently reviewing our approach to the authorisation and supervision of international firms (which includes firms from both EEA and non-EEA jurisdictions). We intend to consult on our proposed approach to branches and subsidiaries. This will supplement our existing Approach to Authorisation and Approach to Supervision documents and, for dual regulated firms, it will sit alongside the PRA’s Supervisory Statements for International Banks (SS1/18) and International Insurers (SS2/18)

We will set out where we see the potential for harm in different scenarios, for example where firms intend to safeguard client money or custody assets or serve certain types of consumers, such as retail consumers, or could pose risks to the good functioning of markets. The Consultation Paper will seek views on ways potential harms can be mitigated. We will also outline our expectations around firms seeking authorisation having a physical presence in the UK. Here our starting point is that, whether or not firms establish a UK legal entity, we will generally expect them to have a physical presence in the UK to help ensure that we can effectively supervise them. Firms will also need to ensure that personnel in the UK (including management and decision-making structures) and the systems in the UK (taking into account any offshore or outsourcing dependencies) are adequate for the firm to be effectively supervised.

Firms should also consider our guide to the Senior Managers & Certification Regime. This explains how the regime will apply to FCA solo-regulated firms when it is rolled out on 9 December 2019.

Payments and e-money firms

The process of leaving the regime is different for payments and e-money firms due to the different authorisation and registration conditions that apply to these firms.

EEA payment institutions (PI) will have to establish an authorised or registered UK subsidiary to provide services in the UK when the EEA firm’s temporary permission ends. This will also apply to e-money institutions (EMI) which provide payment services that are unrelated to e-money issuance.

EEA e-money institutions which only provide payment services related to e-money issuance, and EEA registered account information service providers (RAISP) will have to become authorised or registered to continue providing services in the UK when their temporary permission ends. These firms will not have to set up a UK subsidiary.

Rather than being allocated a landing slot, these firms must send us a ‘notice of intention’ within one year of exit day. In this notice, a firm must tell us whether it or a UK subsidiary (whichever is applicable) intends to apply for authorisation or, in the case of a RAISP, whether it intends to apply for registration or whether it is intending to cease providing payment services in the UK.

Firms should bear in mind the statutory deadlines for us to determine authorisation or registration applications, given the three-year maximum duration of the TP firms must allow sufficient time for the application to be considered in order to be able to continue providing payment or e-money services when the regime ends.

The notification process for funds

Fund managers will need to notify us of which of their stock of passported funds they wish to continue to market in the UK temporarily using Connect. Notifications will need to be submitted by the end of 30 January 2020.

Fund managers should submit their notification with a full list of the funds they wish to continue marketing in the UK after exit day. If managers think they will add funds to their notification before the window closes, they should wait until they have a full list before submitting it to us.

If a fund is divided into sub-funds, the manager must notify us which of the sub-funds they want to enter the regime. Only these sub-funds will keep their marketing rights.

Read more information on the temporary marketing permission regimes, including our directions.

We have also published a guide to Connect for fund managers (PDF) covering the notification process.

Fund managers should note that if they have passports other than for the purposes of marketing funds in the UK (for example, a passport to manage UK domiciled funds, or conduct ‘top up’ activities under the UCITS Directive or AIFMD), they should also submit a firm temporary permission notification form, if appropriate – see the notification process for firms above.

There will be no fee for fund managers notifying us of which of their stock of passported funds (or sub-funds) they wish to continue to market in the UK temporarily and fund managers should not wait for confirmation of whether there will be an implementation period before they submit their notification.

Once the notification window has closed, fund managers that have not submitted a notification for existing funds or sub-funds will be unable to use the temporary marketing permission regime for that fund and will not be able to market the fund in the UK in the same manner as they did before exit day. The only exception to this is for new sub-funds of EEA UCITS that are in the temporary marketing permission regime on exit day (see above).

Details of EEA UCITS with a temporary marketing permission will be shown on the FS Register.

New sub-funds to EEA AIF umbrella schemes which have entered the temporary marketing permissions regime cannot be added to the temporary marketing permissions regime. New sub-funds will need to be marketed via the National Private Placement Regime (NPPR) procedure. Fund managers may, if they think it more straightforward, notify sub-funds and umbrellas in the temporary marketing permissions regime for entry via NPPR alongside any new sub-fund that they are seeking to market in the UK. Once the notification has been processed, you will have been deemed to exit the temporary marketing permissions regime for the relevant funds.

Please note that funds which have not been passported into the UK cannot enter the temporary marketing permissions regime. Certain categories of funds which were not eligible to market in the UK under passport before exit day, can still be marketed in the UK in the same manner as they were before exit day. These include:

  • EEA AIFs managed by UK domiciled firms and third-country AIFs
  • EEA AIFs which are feeders for a third-country master AIF, managed by EEA domiciled firms

The FCA intends to apply the Temporary Transitional Power in relation to the provisions which govern how such AIFs can be marketed in the UK after exit day. This will allow such funds to be marketed in the UK on the same basis as they were before exit day for a temporary period, from exit day until midnight 31 December 2020.

We expect the notification process to be straightforward for Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMs) in TMPR who want to continue to market Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs), European Social Entrepreneurship Funds (EuSEFs) or European Venture Capital Funds (EuVECAs) once the TMPR ends. We expect to begin allocating ‘landing slots’ to such AIFMs shortly after exit.

Conversely, we do not expect to specify any landing slots for EEA UCITS schemes during the 12 months after exit. We will seek to provide sufficient notice of landing slots to give firms time to prepare applications or notifications and set out further details shortly after exit.

Rules which will apply to fund operators in the regime

As with firms in the regime, we are taking a proportionate approach. However, funds must enter the temporary permissions regime to continue marketing in the same manner or ensure they have another legal basis on which they may market their units to specific types of investors in the UK. Operators, depositories and trustees of funds in the regime will need to continue to comply with all relevant UK marketing rules.

Further details are included in our Policy Statement.

Temporary permissions regime funding

We recover our annual funding requirement (AFR) through periodic fees, paid annually in each fee-year (our fee-year runs from 1 April to 31 March). We consult each year, in April, on the allocation of the AFR across a series of fee-blocks that reflect broad sectors of the industry and are based on the regulated activities firms undertake in the UK. Funds have a separate fee-block within this series.

The AFR we recover from periodic fees is net of the contribution to our costs made by applicants for authorisation/recognition. Applicants pay authorisation/recognition fees when they submit their applications. The level of fees depends on the type of regulated activities the applicant is seeking permission to undertake and for funds depends on the type of fund and number of sub-funds.

Find out more about our fees.

Annual (periodic) fees

We first consulted on the basis that firms and funds in the temporary permission regime will pay periodic fees from the 2019/20 fee year: Consultation Paper CP19/29.

Following consideration of the responses to this consultation we have decided not to require TP firms to report tariff data (measure of size) relating to business they undertake on a cross-border service basis. TP branch firms would continue to pay the minimum fees and variable fees on the tariff data above the minimum size thresholds but fees discounts would not apply. TP cross-border service firms would only pay the minimum fees (previously they paid no periodic fees). Funds would pay periodic fees on the same basis as they did prior to entering the temporary permission regime. 

Further details are included in our Policy Statement PS19/5.

Our first consultation was based on preparing for the UK leaving the EU without a withdrawal agreement or transition period (no-deal scenario) on the 29 March 2019. If a no-deal scenario had occurred on 29 March 2019 the temporary permission regime and the basis for fees we consulted on in CP18/29 would have applied for the whole of the 2019/20 fee-year (1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020). 

The draft 2019/20 fee rates were consulted on in our Consultation Paper CP19/16. CP19/16 included a second consultation on the basis that firms would pay periodic fees if a no deal scenario occurred part way through the 2019/20 fee-year. In order to provide EEA branch firms and service firms with some certainty on the level of their 2019/20 fees we proposed to continue to apply all fee discounts and not charge service firms periodic fees for the 2019/20 fee-year even in a no deal scenario during that fee-year. We provided feedback on responses to that consultation and published the final fee rates in July 2019 through PS19/19, following which invoices have been issued.

Find out more about the periodic fees cycle.

The transitional power and application of legislative requirements to firms and investment funds

The Treasury has provided the financial services regulators with a power to phase in post-exit requirements, allowing flexibility for firms and investment funds to transition to a fully domestic UK regulatory framework.

Firms and investment funds in the temporary permission and supervised run-off regime will be subject to rules on the basis set out in PS19/5 from exit day. However, to the extent that the transitional power is used to provide relief more generally in respect of any of rules with which firms and funds in the regime are expected to comply (please refer to our statement on the transitional power for more detail), this relief will also be available for firms and funds in the regime. See our rules for TP firms in the FCA Handbook at GEN 2.2.26R onwards and in particular, GEN 2.2.27R(3) and (4) and GEN 2.2.33R(3)).

To the extent that transitional relief will be provided in respect of obligations outside of our Handbook, this relief will also be available for firms and funds in the regime. In addition, where a regulatory obligation outside of our Handbook applies for the first time following exit day because it relates to a matter previously reserved to the firm’s home state regulator, we intend to permit substituted compliance with the equivalent obligation in the firm’s home state in the same way as we are proposing for our Handbook rules, unless otherwise indicated. There is more information in our Policy Statement.

We do not intend to provide transitional relief for any of the rules which we have proposed specifically for firms or funds in the regime – as specified on this page.

The financial services contracts regime

The Government has established the financial services contracts regime (FSCR) via the Financial Services Contracts (Transitional and Saving Provision) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 If the UK leaves the EU without a withdrawal agreement, the FSCR will enable firms who do not enter the temporary permissions regime to wind down their UK business in an orderly fashion.

The FSCR will automatically apply to EEA passporting firms that do not notify us that they wish to enter the temporary permissions regime, but have pre-existing contracts in the UK which would need a permission to service.

The 2019/20 fee rates for firms under the FSCR were also consulted on in our Consultation Paper CP19/16.

Firms in the supervised run-off regime are generally subject to the rules set out above for TP firms.

Find out more about the financial services contracts regime.

Preparing to notify

Before notifying, firms and fund managers should take these steps to make the process as simple as possible:

Next steps

The notification window for firms that, following withdrawal, will be solo-regulated by us (and whose passports do not include PRA-regulated activities) will close at the end of 30 January 2020. Firms that have already submitted a notification need take no further action.

The notification window for fund managers to notify us which of their stock of passported funds they wish to continue to market in the UK temporarily will also close at the end of 30 January 2020.

Fund managers that have already submitted a notification need take no further action unless, as a result of this extension, they wish to update their notification before the notification window closes on 30 January 2020. If this is the case, they should email [email protected] by the end of 15 January 2020 at the very latest confirming this and including their FRN.

Notifications should be submitted via our Connect system. We have published guides to using Connect covering the notification process for firms (PDF) and fund managers (PDF).

Once you have submitted your notification, you will receive an email from us to confirm that we have received it.

Firms that do not notify us that they wish to use the temporary permissions regime will be subject to the financial service contracts regime.

If you have any questions please contact us.