Skilled Persons appointments 2017-2021 information – October 2021


Reference Case Number: FOI8589

Freedom of Information: Right to know request:

In respect of Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") Skilled Person ("SP") appointments, whether contracted by a firm or directly by the FCA, and whether or not on the FCA's SP Panel ("Appointments"), made only from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2021:

(i)  The firm, business or trading name of each SP with one or more Appointments ("Appointed SPs").

(ii)  Separately for each Appointed SP, within each quarter of each FCA reporting year (and if you would refuse that request, then alternatively for each FCA reporting year) ("Reporting Period"):

      (a)  The number of Appointments made within that Reporting Period.

      (b)  The number of Appointments made within each Lot within that Reporting Period (and separately the number of Appointments not assigned to any Lot). Please include Appointments of SPs that are not on the FCA's SP Panel, where their Appointments are nevertheless assigned to a Lot including for the purpose of publishing on your website information on the number of SP reports.

      (c)  The total cost as at 31 March 2021 of the Appointments made within that Reporting Period. Here we seek the total cost of all of the Appointments of each SP, not the cost of each individual Appointment.

FCA response:

Point i)

The names of the skilled persons appointed broken down by year can be found in the Annex A Table 1 below.

Point ii)

We can confirm that we hold the requested information; however, we are prohibited from disclosing it to you. In particular, we are unable to disclose the number of appointments for each of the relevant skilled persons and the total costs of the appointments received by each skilled person. This is because these details constitute confidential information that the FCA has received in the course of carrying out its public function under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA).

Section 348 of FSMA prevents us from disclosing ‘confidential information’ we have received except in certain limited circumstances (none of which applies here).  Therefore, under section 44 (Prohibitions on disclosure) of FOIA we are exempted from the duty to disclose such confidential information.

Further details on why this exemption applies can be found in Annex B.

We can, however, confirm that the aggregate cost incurred by the relevant firms in relation to the reviews issued from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2021 is £58.9m. Please note that this figure does not include costs for reviews that started prior to this period.

In addition, the total number of appointments broken down for each of the relevant years can be seen in Annex A Table 2 below.

Annex A

Table 1 – Details of skilled persons with one or more appointments (firms listed in alphabetical order).

Skilled Persons

2017-2018

Skilled Persons

2018-2019

Skilled Persons

2019-2020

Skilled Persons

2020-2021

BDO LLP

BDO LLP

BDO LLP

ATEB

Bovill

Crowe Horwath

Bovill

BDO LLP

Deloitte LLP

Deloitte LLP

Deloitte LLP

Bovill

Duff & Phelps

Duff & Phelps

Duff & Phelps

C&F Partners

Eversheds LLP

Ernst & Young LLP

Ernst & Young LLP

Complyport Limited

Grant Thornton

Eversheds LLP

Eversheds LLP

Cummings Pepperdine

Mazars

Grant Thornton

Exiger

Deloitte LLP

Moore Stephens

Huntswood

Grant Thornton

Duff & Phelps

Ocreus Limited

KPMG LLP

Huntswood

DWF TG Limited

PwC

Moore Stephens

Latham & Watkins (London) LLP

Ernst & Young LLP

RSM

Nettitude

Linklaters

Eversheds LLP

TCC

Norton Rose Fulbright

Macfarlanes LLP

Exiger

 

Ocreus Limited

Ocreus Limited

Grant Thornton

 

Oliver Wyman

PA Consulting Group

Huntswood

 

PKF Littlejohn

Protiviti

KPMG LLP

 

Promontory

PwC

Mazars

 

PwC

RSM

Ocreus Limited

 

Security Alliance Limited

SA Compliance Management Ltd

Optima Partners

 

TCC

TCC

PA Consulting Group

   

The Berkeley Partnership LLP

Promontory Financial Group

     

Protiviti

     

PwC

     

RSM

Table 2 – Quarterly breakdown of Lot Allocations

 

2017-2018

Total

 

2018-2019

Total

2019-2020

Total

2020-2021 

Total

Grand Total

Row Labels

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

 

 

Lot A – Client Assets

1

1

 

 

2

 

1

1

2

4

 

1

3

2

6

3

 

 

 

3

15

Lot B – Governance and Individual Accountability

1

     

1

 

1

1

 

2

2

1

1

1

5

1

1

5

 

7

15

Lot C – Controls and Risk Management Frameworks

1

 

2

 

3

1

1

2

3

7

2

3

2

5

12

3

6

5

8

22

44

Lot D – Conduct of Business

3

2

1

1

7

 

2

2

 

4

2

4

3

5

14

3

3

6

3

15

40

Lot E – Financial Crime

3

1

3

4

11

2

8

3

1

14

3

3

1

9

16

2

4

5

6

17

58

Lot H – Prudential – credit, market, pension and liquidity risk within investment firms,  Intermediaries and Recognised Investment Exchanges.

 

1

1

 

2

       

 

     

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

3

Lot I – Prudential - operational risk, recovery and resolution and wind-down

 

     

 

 

1

   

1

       

 

 

 

 

1

1

2

Lot J – Technology and Information Management

 

 

1

 

1

       

 

 

1

 

1

2

 

 

1

 

1

4

Lot L – CBEST Threat Intelligence

 

     

 

 

1

   

1

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Lot N – CBEST Penetration Testing

 

     

 

 

1

   

1

 

1

   

1

 

 

 

 

 

2

Grand Total

9

5

8

5

27

3

16

9

6

34

9

14

10

24

57

12

14

22

18

66

184

Annex B

  • Section 44 (Prohibitions on Disclosure)

Section 44(1)(a) of FOIA states that information is absolutely exempt from disclosure if this is prohibited by law.  Section 348 of FSMA restricts the FCA from disclosing ‘confidential information’ it has received in the course of carrying out its public function.  FSMA allows exceptions to this in a few specific circumstances, but none of these apply to this request.

Confidential information here is defined as non-public and non-anonymised information involving a person’s business or other affairs, which the FCA received in the course of carrying out its public function.

The information you requested is confidential information under this provision.  If we disclosed this information, without the provider’s consent and the consent of the person the information is about, we would be in breach of section 348 of FSMA.  This would be a criminal offence.

In many requests for information under FOIA we have to judge different factors to decide whether disclosing the requested information would be in the public interest or not.  For this request, we have an ‘absolute’ exemption against supplying the information, and so we do not need to make this kind of judgement.