Rationale for the market study
We have launched a market study into the distribution of pure protection products to consumers acting in their personal capacity. We are examining whether the distribution of pure protection products works well against our operational objectives, including whether competition works in the interest of consumers. If the distribution of pure protection products is working well, consumers should be able, for example, to buy products and services that meet their needs, provide fair value, and support them in making timely, well-informed decisions.
We observe positive indicators in pure protection, including a relatively low number of complaints received by the Financial Ombudsman and, according to published Association of British Insurers (ABI) data, over 95% of new consumer claims being paid out on some products (eg term assurance).
There are also indications that distribution of pure protection products may not be fully effective. We are examining the incentives created by commission structures, competitive constraints on insurers and intermediaries, and the influence of other market participants (such as re-insurers, portals, research firms and lead generators) on distribution. We are also exploring any potential barriers to innovation and investment.
We will also assess whether the consumer outcomes that we observe align with those expected under the Consumer Duty and/or our PROD rules. Concerns include unnecessary consumer switching driven by intermediaries, commission practices that may not represent fair value (eg raising premiums to pay an intermediary higher commission), and fair value issues with some products (eg guaranteed acceptance over 50s insurance). Some studies also suggest a substantial protection gap in pure protection products.
Our Terms of Reference set out why we are doing the market study, its scope, the key issues we are exploring, the potential outcomes that our work might lead to, and our next steps.