Call for Input: Future regulation of alternative fund managers

Call for Input published
07/04/2025
Call for Input closed
09/06/2025
09/06/2025

We asked for feedback on our proposed approach to changing the regulatory framework for alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) in the UK.

Read the Call for Input (PDF)

Why we are consulting

Our Call for Input accompanied a consultation by the Treasury on its proposed changes to the legal framework. It is intended to give stakeholders clarity about the intended direction of our reforms and an opportunity to comment before we develop detailed rules and guidance for consultation.

We want to make it easier for firms to grow, compete, innovate and enter the market. We also want to protect consumers and encourage firms to manage risks responsibly. This work is part of our commitment to streamline the regulatory regime for asset managers. We believe that clearer rules, better tailored to firms, could create efficiencies in how firms do business and further support economic growth and competition.

Who this is for

This will interest, among others, managers of alternative investment funds and the organisations that provide services to them.

Next steps

This Call for Input has now closed.

We plan to consult on detailed rules in 2026, subject to decisions by the Treasury on the future regime. 

We will also provide more details on the timeline for implementation. 

Background

Much of the UK’s asset management regulation is derived from European Union (EU) legislation, including the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). The Treasury has proposed to bring into effect provisions to repeal AIFMD’s firm-facing legislation. Where appropriate, we will replace the relevant legal provisions in our rules. We will also be reviewing our existing requirements for firms.

We want to ensure our approach is proportionate to firms’ size and activities, allowing for growth without sudden or undue regulatory burdens. We want to remove unnecessary regulation and reduce the administrative burden for all AIFMs. We also want a regime that has enough flexibility to allow firms to do business across borders and that is consistent with international standards.

: Information changed Updates to next steps.