In 2012, we identified failings in the way that some banks sold structured collars, swaps, simple collars and cap products, which we collectively refer to as IRHPs. The banks involved agreed to review their sales of IRHPs1 made to unsophisticated customers2 since 2001. The full review started in May 2013 and the banks have now sent a redress determination letter to 17,000 businesses. So far, £1.9 billion has been paid in redress, including £400 million to deal with consequential losses.
The nine banks that are reviewing their sales of IRHPs are:
|Allied Irish Bank (UK)||Bank of Ireland||Barclays|
|Clydesdale & Yorkshire Banks||Co-operative Bank||HSBC|
|Lloyds Banking Group||Royal Bank of Scotland||Santander UK|
The voluntary agreements establishing the IRHP scheme are supported by independent reviewers appointed under s.166 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Every case is overseen and verified by an independent reviewer.
The banks sought to identify eligible customers who were sold structured collars, swaps, or simple collars and invited them into the review. All such claims have now been determined and offers of basic redress made where appropriate. Of the 18,000 customers identified, 16,000 chose to join the review, and 2,000 have chosen not to participate. At 89%, customer engagement has been high.
Customers who purchased cap products were contacted by the banks and advised that these sales would only be included in the review if they proactively complain to their bank and asked customers to do so by 31 March 2015. Around 2,000 out of 7,000 customers have complained to their banks about their cap products.
Customers who did not join the IRHP review before 31 March 2015 still have the following options (subject to time limits for making a complaint or bringing a claim):
All nine banks have now completed their sales reviews and have delivered redress letters to all but a handful of these customers.
The banks have sent 17,000 redress determinations to customers, 14,000 of which include a cash redress offer, and 3,000 confirm that the IRHP sale complied with our rules or that the customer suffered no loss.
To date, around 12,000 customers have accepted a redress offer and £1.9 billion is being paid out, including more than £400 million to cover consequential losses. This means that, so far, 85% of offers have been accepted. For those banks who got their letters out earlier, the acceptance rates are more than 90%.
In addition to the £1.9 billion of redress payable to customers, the banks have set aside money to cover the costs of having to terminate customers’ IRHPs early (the banks bear the cost of IRHP payments that customers would have made in the future), the costs of employing more than 3,000 people to carry out the review exercise, and the costs of engaging independent reviewers to look at every case.
The charts and tables below summarise the banks’ progress and the position at the end of March:
For those customers who have received an offer and are considering whether or not to accept it, the banks will continue to hold meetings, during which customers can obtain a more detailed explanation of the decision, ask questions and, if appropriate, provide additional information. The banks and independent reviewers will carefully consider any points that are raised by customers.
The banks and independent reviewers will also continue to assess customers’ claims for consequential losses. Every redress offer has 8% simple interest per year added which is intended to compensate customers for the lost opportunity cost of being deprived of their money (e.g. lost interest or profits). Customers who can demonstrate that the losses caused by their IRHP exceeded 8% per year can submit a consequential loss claim.
We expect the banks and independent reviewers to complete their work by Summer 2015. We will continue to provide close oversight of the IRHP review and will provide quarterly updates, including information about the progress of consequential loss claims.
1For these purposes, we mean IRHPs that are derivatives which are separate to a lending arrangement and are for the purpose of managing interest rate fluctuations.
2That is, customers classified under our rules as either ‘private customers’ (in relation to sales made on or before 31 October 2007) or ‘retail clients’ (for sales made on or after 1 November 2007), and assessed as being eligible for the review under the ‘sophistication test’.
Copyright © 2015 FCA. All Rights Reserved.