EMIR imposes requirements on all types and sizes of entities that enter into any form of derivative contract, including those not involved in financial services. It applies indirectly to non-EU firms trading with EU firms.
The new regulation comes into force during 2013 and 2014. It requires entities that enter into any form of derivative contract, including interest rate, foreign exchange, equity, credit and commodity derivatives, to:
Implementation dates are subject to change depending on the progress of EU implementation.
Market participants can register to receive email updates on the EMIR from the FCA. These include information on the implementation timetable, alerts when new documents or further guidance are published and further details about the process for apply for making notifications and applying for exemptions in the UK.
To register to receive updates please email you name and contact details (including email address) to EMIR@fca.org.uk. You can unsubscribe at any time by emailing unsubscribe and your name and email address to the same address.
Before contacting the FCA please review the information included in these web pages and the EMIR library, we aim to include the answer to a lot of common questions here. If you still have questions in relation to EMIR and its implementation in the UK please contact email@example.com.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) approved the registrations of two further trade repositories (TRs) on 28 November under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). The newly registered TRs for the European Union (EU) are:
This means that they can be used by the counterparties to a derivative transaction to fulfil their trade reporting obligations under EMIR. The registrations will come into force on 5 December 2013. Following the registration of a first group of TRs on 7 November 2013, which became effective on 14 November 2013, the reporting obligation start date for all asset classes will begin on 12 February 2014. There are now six TRs registered in the EU, which can be used for trade reporting. ESMA registered DDRL, Regis-TR, UnaVista and KDPW on 7 November and has not received any further applications for registration.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued final draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) related to derivative transactions by non-European Union (EU) counterparties last week. The RTS provide more detail on the application of EMIR to transactions between non-EU counterparties with a direct, substantial and foreseeable effect within the Union and in relation to non-evasion.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA), The British Bankers Association (BBA), The Investment Management Association (IMA) and Markit announced the launch of the EMIR Counterparty Classification Tool. It is an online service that facilitates compliance with European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) requirements regarding classification of counterparties to OTC derivatives contracts and application of the relevant standards of the regulatory requirements. Additional information regarding the tool is available on ISDA’s EMIR Focus Page.
Please note that the London Stock Exchange (LSE) has now been globally endorsed as a provider of pre-LEIs (as of the 11 November). Please see the LEI Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC) website for the full note. The use of globally endorsed pre-LEIs is also referenced in the recently updated ESMA Q&As. This means that pre-LEIs issued by the LSE can be accepted for reporting under EMIR in the EU, Swap Data reporting in the US and also for other jurisdictions who mandate the use of the LEI for trade reporting and are members of the ROC Plenary. It is strongly anticipated that all pre-LEIs that are globally endorsed will transition into LEIs once the LEI governance structure is fully established.
The first trade repository registration decisions have now been made. These registration decisions will take effect from 14 November 2013. On 12 February 2014 the EMIR requirement to report derivatives transactions to trade repositories will come into force. More information on these initial registrations can be found on the reporting to trade repositories page.
ESMA has now published an updated version of the Questions & Answers on EMIR implementation. The table of questions on pages six and seven provides a record of which questions and answers are new or have been updated.
EMIR requires all non-EEA CCPs offering clearing services to clearing members or trading venues in the EEA to seek recognition from ESMA. In order to continuing offering such clearing services, the non-EEA CCPs were required to apply to ESMA for recognition by 15 September. ESMA has published a list, which is not necessarily exhaustive, of non-EEA CCPs which have submitted an application.
The FCA plans to undertake a number of implementation reviews on key EMIR obligations, with pre-implementation reviews being conducted in advance of obligations taking effect, to assess readiness and establish any areas of concern, and post-implementation reviews conducted shortly afterwards. The results of the first reviews which focused on the risk mitigation techniques and non-financial counterparties under EMIR have now been published.
ESMA has published its second set of advice to the European Commission on the equivalence of non-EU jurisdictions with EMIR. Following a first set of advice published on 9 September 2013, ESMA has now published its equivalence assessments of the regulatory regimes of Canada, India and South Korea and supplements to its equivalence assessments for Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and Switzerland.
Submissions for exemptions for intragroup transactions from the clearing obligation are now being accepted through the FCA EMIR web portal. Please note that submissions are currently only being accepted for transactions between two entities in the same group which are both established in the UK. For more detailed information, please see the EMIR notifications and exemptions page.
Since 15 September 2013, financial counterparties have been required to report any disputes between counterparties relating to an OTC derivative contract, its valuation or the exchange of collateral for an amount or a higher value than EUR 15 million and outstanding for at least 15 business days.
The FCA requires financial counterparties to ensure that by the 15th of each month any disputes outstanding in the previous month have been reported through the EMIR web portal. However the deadline for reporting disputes outstanding between 15 September and 30 September has been extended by one week to 22 October, to make sure there is enough time for counterparties to register. More information on dispute reporting and how to register to use the web portal.
The FCA has published a statement on hybrid systems trading physically settled gas and power forwards, clarifying that physically settled gas and power forwards traded on multilateral trading facilities (“MTFs”) are “financial instruments” for the purposes of MiFID and “OTC derivatives” or “OTC derivative contracts” for the purposes of EMIR.
ESMA has published its advice to the European Commission on the equivalence of the regulatory regimes for OTC derivatives clearing, central counterparties (CCPs), and trade repositories (TR) of non-EU countries with the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). ESMA has assessed the equivalence of the regulatory regimes of Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland and the US. Further details are available on the ESMA website.
In Chapter 11 of September’s Quarterly Consultation Paper (QCP), a number of FCA Handbook changes are proposed in respect of EMIR. These changes aim to reflect, and make firms aware of, the FCA’s powers set out in the domestic legislation that HM Treasury recently laid before Parliament. This follows the changes to the FCA Handbook in April, which related to the first statutory instrument that was made by HM Treasury.
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) have now published the final framework for margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. See the press release and final report in the links below:
The final requirements have been developed taking into account feedback from two rounds of consultation (a July 2012 consultative paper and a February 2013 near-final proposal) as well as a quantitative impact study [text deleted]. Under the requirements, all financial firms and systemically important non-financial entities that engage in non-centrally cleared derivatives will have to exchange initial and variation margin commensurate with the counterparty risk arising from such transactions. The requirements will be phased-in over a four-year period, beginning in December 2015.
These requirements will be implemented in the EU through new binding technical standards under article 11 of EMIR. The European Banking Authority, in co-operation with the other European Supervisory Authorities, will consult on these rules in due course.
The Financial Stability Board has been tasked by the G20 with monitoring global progress in implementing agreed reforms to OTC derivatives markets. It has recently published a summary update on progress and a more detailed progress report.
From 15 September 2013 financial counterparties must report any disputes between counterparties relating to an OTC derivative contract, its valuation or the exchange of collateral for an amount or a higher value than EUR 15 million and outstanding for at least 15 business days. We explain what financial counterparties must provide in these reports and give some further information on the process, including how firms must register on the FCA EMIR web portal to report these disputes.
The ESMA EMIR Q&A’s have been updated to provide further information for counterparties, CCPs and Trade Repositories on the interpretation and implementation of EMIR. Read the Q&A's on ESMA’s website.
On the 31 July 2013 a second EMIR Statutory Instrument was laid before UK Parliament. The Statutory Instrument includes further supervisory and enforcement powers indirect client accounts at a clearing member and the transfer of indirect client accounts when a client fails to provide indirect clearing services. An indirect client is a client of a clearing member’s client.
Copyright © 2013 FCA. All Rights Reserved.